Other tools rate bias, sources, and left vs right.·FrameCheck gives you a clean, emotional-language rating instead — Grammarly for reading the news.
FrameCheck
Join early access
Early development · Media literacy tool

See how the language is working on you.

FrameCheck gives news articles a simple transparency label, showing emotional language, loaded wording, speculation, and evidence signals before you decide what to think.

Join early access See a sample label
cavedverbEmotionally loaded
may havephraseSpeculative
confirmedverbNeutral wording

Early development.·No censorship.·No political ratings.·Just language transparency.

Watch it work

Open an article. See the framing in seconds.

🔒 news-example.com/politics/budget-statement 72
Politics
Minister caved on budget pledge after mounting pressure

The minister admitted the figures were questionable, in what critics called a humiliating reversal. Sources suggest the decision may have been rushed.

Transparency Label
72 /100 pressure
Loaded words29
Speculation7
Fact / interp.46 / 54
What it is

Not a fact-checker. A framing detector.

FrameCheck doesn’t ask whether an article is right. It checks the hygiene of the writing — how the language is built — and gives you a clear breakdown of the patterns shaping your reaction. You decide what to think.

Emotional Language

Detects loaded adjectives and intensity words.

Loaded Verbs

Flags words like “slammed,” “caved,” “blasted,” or “admitted.”

Evidence Signals

Highlights sourcing, quotes, anonymous claims, and speculation.

Sample report

One glance. The whole picture.

Every article gets a transparency label — a quick, readable summary of the language signals at work, so you can see the framing before it shapes your reaction.

Article Transparency Label
72/ 100 · Language Pressure Score
Loaded adjectives18
shockingdisgracefuldangerous
Loaded verbs11
slammedblastedcaved
Speculative claims7
may haveappears tosources suggest
Anonymous sources2
Direct evidence links3
Fact vs interpretation46% / 54%
Observable fact 46%Interpretation 54%
Hover a row to reveal example words. Example report for demonstration — scoring model is still in development.
Why it matters

Most influence happens in the wording, not the facts.

Two articles can describe the same event with different emotional force. “The minister said,” “the minister admitted,” and “the minister caved” can all point to the same event while creating very different impressions.

FrameCheck helps readers pause, see the framing, and make up their own mind.

Frame shift · same event, different pressure
“Government confirms”Neutral
↓
“Government says”Neutral
↓
“Government admits”Interpretation
↓
“Government caved”Emotionally loaded
Compare coverage

Same event. Different language pressure.

No judgement, no political rating — just the measurable emotional force in how each outlet wrote it up.

Outlet A
38
Outlet B
52
Outlet C
71
Outlet D
84

Illustrative sample data for demonstration. Scoring model is still in development.

How it works

Three steps. Two seconds.

1

Paste or open an article

Drop in a link or read normally with the browser extension running.

2

FrameCheck scans language patterns

It reads the wording for emotional force, speculation, and evidence — not the politics.

3

You get a simple transparency label

A clear, readable breakdown so you can decide what to think for yourself.

Our principles

Built around free speech, not censorship.

Early access

Want to test the first version?

FrameCheck is currently in early development. Join the waitlist to help shape the first version and get access when the prototype is ready.

No spam. We’ll only email you about early access.

✓

You’re on the list.

Thanks for joining early access — we’ll be in touch when the prototype is ready.